#72332: "improved layout for after-game dice statistics (with proposed mock-up)"
Despre ce este vorba acest raport?
Ce s-a întâmplat? Te rugăm alege de mai jos
Ce s-a întâmplat? Te rugăm alege de mai jos
Verificați dacă există deja un raport privind același subiect
Dacă da, te rugăm VOTEAZĂ pentru acest raport. Rapoartele cu cele mai multe voturi au PRIORITATE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descriere detaliată
-
• Te rugăm copiază/lipeşte mesajul erorii pe care îl vezi pe ecran, dacă apare vreunul.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Explică, te rugăm, ce ai vrut să faci, ce ai făcut, și ce s-a întâmplat
• Care e browserul tău?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?
• Care e browserul tău?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Care e browserul tău?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Ce a fost afișat pe ecran atunci când ai fost blocat (Ecran gol? O parte din interfața jocului? Mesaj de eroare?)
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Care e browserul tău?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Care parte din reguli nu a fost respectată de adaptarea BGA
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Se observă frauda când derulați reluarea? Dacă da, la a câta mutare?
• Care e browserul tău?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Care a fost acțiunea pe care ai vrut să o faci?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Ce ai făcut de ai produs această reacție/eroare?
-
• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să faci asta (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?
• Care e browserul tău?
Firefox for Windows
-
• În ce etapă a jocului a apărut eroarea (care era instrucțiunea din acel moment) ?
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să acționezi în joc (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?
• Care e browserul tău?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Descrieți, vă rugăm, problema de afișaj. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Care e browserul tău?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). -
• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?
• Care e browserul tău?
Firefox for Windows
-
• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.
After each game, this is how the dice statistics are laid out: snipboard.io/8gX2oL.jpg
Here is my proposed improvement: snipboard.io/uc5LQM.jpg
Advantages:
(1) the counts of each sum are labelled and distinguishable from the percentages (in the current format, the percent sign is not used, leaving players confused about whether the figures shown are percentages or not);
(2) the horizontal "grid" layout is more compact than the existing vertical "list" layout;
(3) the "expected percentage" is clearly labelled (instead of the tilde symbol in the current format, which some people might not understand.
Instead of the term "expected percentage", you may wish to use the phrase "long-term average" or something similar.
This suggestion supersedes boardgamearena.com/bug?id=64097 (which is obsolete). • Care e browserul tău?
Firefox for Windows
Raportează istoric
In effect, the omission of the % symbol and the rounding to the nearest percentage point leads people to assume that a game had, perhaps 98 or 101 rolls, rather than 50 or 60 which is typical. Then you can do the math correctly and you find that the probability of no 9's being rolled is about 1 in 100,000, assuming 98 rolls per game. But on BGA, it occurs around once in 400 games (since the true number of rolls per game is usually 50 or 60). This can lead them to believe that the dice algorithm is either buggy or rigged.
Examples:
boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=125351#p125351
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=66082
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=67316
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=70809
Adaugă ceva la acest raport
- Alt identificator de masă / de mutare
- A rezolvat F5 problema?
- Această problemă a apărut de mai multe ori? De fiecare dată? Ocazional?
- Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
