• Te rugăm copiază/lipeşte mesajul erorii pe care îl vezi pe ecran, dacă apare vreunul.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Explică, te rugăm, ce ai vrut să faci, ce ai făcut, și ce s-a întâmplat

• Care e browserul tău?

• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Ce a fost afișat pe ecran atunci când ai fost blocat (Ecran gol? O parte din interfața jocului? Mesaj de eroare?)

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Care parte din reguli nu a fost respectată de adaptarea BGA

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Se observă frauda când derulați reluarea? Dacă da, la a câta mutare?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Care a fost acțiunea pe care ai vrut să o faci?

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Ce ai făcut de ai produs această reacție/eroare?

• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să faci asta (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?

• Care e browserul tău?

• În ce etapă a jocului a apărut eroarea (care era instrucțiunea din acel moment) ?

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să acționezi în joc (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Descrieți, vă rugăm, problema de afișaj. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.

Can you check or explain the end result on this game?
We ended with scores:
- EDOARDO77: score = 0, badness = 3
- wolmot: score = 0, badness = 4
- James_Games: score = -1, badness = 1

As I understand from the rules: "Players with the highest or negative shift score are ranked as the lowest altogether. The least extra badness breaks the tie among the others".

So that means James_Games ranks last, and the 2 others are tied, and tie is resolved with badness score so EDOARDO77 ranks #1 and wins the game, while wolmot should rank #2, right?

But instead the game result shows wolmot and James_Games both rank #2 with score -99 and tiebreak = 0
?

• Care e browserul tău?