#42737: "Stale games rule should take into account the number of cards"
Despre ce este vorba acest raport?
Ce s-a întâmplat? Te rugăm alege de mai jos
Ce s-a întâmplat? Te rugăm alege de mai jos
Verificați dacă există deja un raport privind același subiect
Dacă da, te rugăm VOTEAZĂ pentru acest raport. Rapoartele cu cele mai multe voturi au PRIORITATE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descriere detaliată
-
• Te rugăm copiază/lipeşte mesajul erorii pe care îl vezi pe ecran, dacă apare vreunul.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Explică, te rugăm, ce ai vrut să faci, ce ai făcut, și ce s-a întâmplat
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Ce a fost afișat pe ecran atunci când ai fost blocat (Ecran gol? O parte din interfața jocului? Mesaj de eroare?)
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Care parte din reguli nu a fost respectată de adaptarea BGA
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Se observă frauda când derulați reluarea? Dacă da, la a câta mutare?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Care a fost acțiunea pe care ai vrut să o faci?
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Ce ai făcut de ai produs această reacție/eroare?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards -
• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să faci asta (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v91
-
• În ce etapă a jocului a apărut eroarea (care era instrucțiunea din acel moment) ?
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să acționezi în joc (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Descrieți, vă rugăm, problema de afișaj. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
-
• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?
Turns 302 and 319 are identical except that my opponent had one card less. He had to use it to get out of position 302. If he had had another identical card, he would have been able to reproduce the same escape, but I would not have been able to go back to that position because of the current stale game rule.
RQ: It was not the case and therefore the game result would not have been different with a correct rule taking into account the players cards • Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v91
-
• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.
Stale games rule (identical position 3 times) should take into account the number of cards and not just the positions of the tractors
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v91
Raportează istoric
I don't remember exactly the full reasons, but I remember discussing it with Quentin when we designed the feature.
The rule was designed to force the currently winning player to not block the game by repeating the same moves endlessly while the loosing player try to protect their position.
The winning player interest is to give up on the attack to avoid the draw. While the loosing player can be interested in blocking to get a draw instead of a loss.
Adaugă ceva la acest raport
- Alt identificator de masă / de mutare
- A rezolvat F5 problema?
- Această problemă a apărut de mai multe ori? De fiecare dată? Ocazional?
- Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
