• Te rugăm copiază/lipeşte mesajul erorii pe care îl vezi pe ecran, dacă apare vreunul.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Explică, te rugăm, ce ai vrut să faci, ce ai făcut, și ce s-a întâmplat

• Care e browserul tău?

• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Ce a fost afișat pe ecran atunci când ai fost blocat (Ecran gol? O parte din interfața jocului? Mesaj de eroare?)

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Care parte din reguli nu a fost respectată de adaptarea BGA

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Se observă frauda când derulați reluarea? Dacă da, la a câta mutare?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Care a fost acțiunea pe care ai vrut să o faci?

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Ce ai făcut de ai produs această reacție/eroare?

• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să faci asta (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?

• Care e browserul tău?

• În ce etapă a jocului a apărut eroarea (care era instrucțiunea din acel moment) ?

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să acționezi în joc (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Descrieți, vă rugăm, problema de afișaj. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?

• Care e browserul tău?

• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.

Screenshot: cheddarmonk.org/forumimg/6_nimmt_stats.png

1. We played 5 rounds of 10 cards, so each of us played 50 cards. I don't understand how the "Number of cards played" statistic is higher than 50 for all of us.
2. The "Average card value" appears to be "Total card value" (of cards played?) divided by "Number of cards played", except for the third placed player, for whom it's 100x larger.
3. This is really a separate issue, but "took" should be "taken" in all of the names where it occurs.

• Care e browserul tău?