• Te rugăm copiază/lipeşte mesajul erorii pe care îl vezi pe ecran, dacă apare vreunul.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Explică, te rugăm, ce ai vrut să faci, ce ai făcut, și ce s-a întâmplat

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Ce a fost afișat pe ecran atunci când ai fost blocat (Ecran gol? O parte din interfața jocului? Mesaj de eroare?)

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Care parte din reguli nu a fost respectată de adaptarea BGA

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Se observă frauda când derulați reluarea? Dacă da, la a câta mutare?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Care a fost acțiunea pe care ai vrut să o faci?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Ce ai făcut de ai produs această reacție/eroare?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să faci asta (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?

• Care e browserul tău?

• În ce etapă a jocului a apărut eroarea (care era instrucțiunea din acel moment) ?

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să acționezi în joc (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Descrieți, vă rugăm, problema de afișaj. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?

At the end of the game during the ELO calculations.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.

This was a three-way game with players at 165, 191 and 134 ELO. The 134 ELO player lost the game, the other two tied. The calculation of the win for 191 over 134 was 18.86 for both players and that was correctly applied to both players. The calculation of the win for 165 over 134 was calculated correctly as 20.5 for the 134 player. But it was calculated incorrectly as 6.83 for the 165 player. So the 165 player received 14 fewer ELO points than he should have. (See screenshots.) This may be because the 134 player got his ELO change clipped, although the numbers do not match up.

• Care e browserul tău?