• Te rugăm copiază/lipeşte mesajul erorii pe care îl vezi pe ecran, dacă apare vreunul.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Explică, te rugăm, ce ai vrut să faci, ce ai făcut, și ce s-a întâmplat

Noted above inline.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?

Noted above inline.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Ce a fost afișat pe ecran atunci când ai fost blocat (Ecran gol? O parte din interfața jocului? Mesaj de eroare?)

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Care parte din reguli nu a fost respectată de adaptarea BGA

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Se observă frauda când derulați reluarea? Dacă da, la a câta mutare?

Noted above inline.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Care a fost acțiunea pe care ai vrut să o faci?

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Ce ai făcut de ai produs această reacție/eroare?

Noted above inline.

• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să faci asta (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?

• Care e browserul tău?

• În ce etapă a jocului a apărut eroarea (care era instrucțiunea din acel moment) ?

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să acționezi în joc (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?

Noted above inline.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Descrieți, vă rugăm, problema de afișaj. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?

Noted above inline.

• Care e browserul tău?

• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• Care e browserul tău?