#104822: "Displayed score does not update for score over 6 points"
Despre ce este vorba acest raport?
Ce s-a întâmplat? Te rugăm alege de mai jos
Ce s-a întâmplat? Te rugăm alege de mai jos
Verificați dacă există deja un raport privind același subiect
Dacă da, te rugăm VOTEAZĂ pentru acest raport. Rapoartele cu cele mai multe voturi au PRIORITATE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descriere detaliată
-
• Te rugăm copiază/lipeşte mesajul erorii pe care îl vezi pe ecran, dacă apare vreunul.
The final score was correct (49) but the DISPLAYED score was 33.
imgur.com/IQ1OK33
I am pretty sure that what is happening is that if an individual line score is greater than can be displayed by icons (i.e. greater than six) then the individual line score is not added to the displayed score. Twice near the end of the game I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. That is twice 8 for a total of 16. The difference between the displayed score and the actual ending score is that same 16.
The actual ending score is correct. 5 VP to begin the game PLUS 45 VP during the game MINUS one VP stolen by LEGION. -
• Explică, te rugăm, ce ai vrut să faci, ce ai făcut, și ce s-a întâmplat
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v119
-
• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
The final score was correct (49) but the DISPLAYED score was 33.
imgur.com/IQ1OK33
I am pretty sure that what is happening is that if an individual line score is greater than can be displayed by icons (i.e. greater than six) then the individual line score is not added to the displayed score. Twice near the end of the game I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. That is twice 8 for a total of 16. The difference between the displayed score and the actual ending score is that same 16.
The actual ending score is correct. 5 VP to begin the game PLUS 45 VP during the game MINUS one VP stolen by LEGION. -
• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v119
-
• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.
The final score was correct (49) but the DISPLAYED score was 33.
imgur.com/IQ1OK33
I am pretty sure that what is happening is that if an individual line score is greater than can be displayed by icons (i.e. greater than six) then the individual line score is not added to the displayed score. Twice near the end of the game I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. That is twice 8 for a total of 16. The difference between the displayed score and the actual ending score is that same 16.
The actual ending score is correct. 5 VP to begin the game PLUS 45 VP during the game MINUS one VP stolen by LEGION. • Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v119
-
• Ce a fost afișat pe ecran atunci când ai fost blocat (Ecran gol? O parte din interfața jocului? Mesaj de eroare?)
The final score was correct (49) but the DISPLAYED score was 33.
imgur.com/IQ1OK33
I am pretty sure that what is happening is that if an individual line score is greater than can be displayed by icons (i.e. greater than six) then the individual line score is not added to the displayed score. Twice near the end of the game I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. That is twice 8 for a total of 16. The difference between the displayed score and the actual ending score is that same 16.
The actual ending score is correct. 5 VP to begin the game PLUS 45 VP during the game MINUS one VP stolen by LEGION. • Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v119
-
• Care parte din reguli nu a fost respectată de adaptarea BGA
The final score was correct (49) but the DISPLAYED score was 33.
imgur.com/IQ1OK33
I am pretty sure that what is happening is that if an individual line score is greater than can be displayed by icons (i.e. greater than six) then the individual line score is not added to the displayed score. Twice near the end of the game I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. That is twice 8 for a total of 16. The difference between the displayed score and the actual ending score is that same 16.
The actual ending score is correct. 5 VP to begin the game PLUS 45 VP during the game MINUS one VP stolen by LEGION. -
• Se observă frauda când derulați reluarea? Dacă da, la a câta mutare?
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v119
-
• Care a fost acțiunea pe care ai vrut să o faci?
The final score was correct (49) but the DISPLAYED score was 33.
imgur.com/IQ1OK33
I am pretty sure that what is happening is that if an individual line score is greater than can be displayed by icons (i.e. greater than six) then the individual line score is not added to the displayed score. Twice near the end of the game I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. That is twice 8 for a total of 16. The difference between the displayed score and the actual ending score is that same 16.
The actual ending score is correct. 5 VP to begin the game PLUS 45 VP during the game MINUS one VP stolen by LEGION. -
• Ce ai făcut de ai produs această reacție/eroare?
-
• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să faci asta (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v119
-
• În ce etapă a jocului a apărut eroarea (care era instrucțiunea din acel moment) ?
The final score was correct (49) but the DISPLAYED score was 33.
imgur.com/IQ1OK33
I am pretty sure that what is happening is that if an individual line score is greater than can be displayed by icons (i.e. greater than six) then the individual line score is not added to the displayed score. Twice near the end of the game I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. That is twice 8 for a total of 16. The difference between the displayed score and the actual ending score is that same 16.
The actual ending score is correct. 5 VP to begin the game PLUS 45 VP during the game MINUS one VP stolen by LEGION. -
• Ce se întâmplă atunci când vrei să acționezi în joc (apare o eroare, un mesaj din partea jocului in partea de sus a ecranului, ...)?
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v119
-
• Descrieți, vă rugăm, problema de afișaj. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
The final score was correct (49) but the DISPLAYED score was 33.
imgur.com/IQ1OK33
I am pretty sure that what is happening is that if an individual line score is greater than can be displayed by icons (i.e. greater than six) then the individual line score is not added to the displayed score. Twice near the end of the game I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. That is twice 8 for a total of 16. The difference between the displayed score and the actual ending score is that same 16.
The actual ending score is correct. 5 VP to begin the game PLUS 45 VP during the game MINUS one VP stolen by LEGION. • Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v119
-
• Va rugam copiati/lipiti textul afisat in engleza in locul limbii dumneavoastra. Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
The final score was correct (49) but the DISPLAYED score was 33.
imgur.com/IQ1OK33
I am pretty sure that what is happening is that if an individual line score is greater than can be displayed by icons (i.e. greater than six) then the individual line score is not added to the displayed score. Twice near the end of the game I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. That is twice 8 for a total of 16. The difference between the displayed score and the actual ending score is that same 16.
The actual ending score is correct. 5 VP to begin the game PLUS 45 VP during the game MINUS one VP stolen by LEGION. -
• Este textul acesta disponibil în sistemul de traduceri? Dacă da, a fost tradus mai recent de 24 de ore?
• Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v119
-
• Vă rugăm să explicați sugestia exact și concis, astfel încât să fie cât mai ușor de înțeles.
The final score was correct (49) but the DISPLAYED score was 33.
imgur.com/IQ1OK33
I am pretty sure that what is happening is that if an individual line score is greater than can be displayed by icons (i.e. greater than six) then the individual line score is not added to the displayed score. Twice near the end of the game I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. That is twice 8 for a total of 16. The difference between the displayed score and the actual ending score is that same 16.
The actual ending score is correct. 5 VP to begin the game PLUS 45 VP during the game MINUS one VP stolen by LEGION. • Care e browserul tău?
Google Chrome v119
Raportează istoric
imgur.com/1VEEmEC
Same scenario. I scored 8 points for smaller Triumphal Arch (2 VP for 4 buildings) with four spaces with 4 buildings. The final score is 30 but the displayed score is 22
It's clearly a very unusual situation to score more than 6VP from a civil card, which probably explains why no-one else has raised this in over 2 years - but it's still a bug!
I've taken a quick look at my code and in part you're spot on in your diagnosis - for the part where the VP tokens are animating as moving towards your player panel, that does indeed doesn't work properly (or at all) if more than 6VP is scored. Not sure how I missed that but should be easy to fix.
What is less obvious to me is why the actual score didn't update, as that's done in a separate function and it's not instantly obvious to me why that shouldn't work as intended. But I have tired eyes right now and am looking at code I mostly wrote over 2 years ago - now I have some idea what the issue is I hope I'll be able to reproduce it without too many problems.
Thanks again for raising this - I'm not sure when I'll have time to fix it but hopefully within a week or two.
I'm so sorry this took a lot longer than I claimed - the Christmas holiday happened and then a few other things kept me busy, and meanwhile it was harder than I expected to set up this same scenario to test and observe what was happening. As soon as I did it was obvious what the problem was (which was exactly what I'd already said above - I just hadn't realised that my faulty code was actually throwing a JS error which made subsequent events, notably the updating of the VP, not happen), and easy to fix - so this should be fixed now.
Thanks again for the report!
Adaugă ceva la acest raport
- Alt identificator de masă / de mutare
- A rezolvat F5 problema?
- Această problemă a apărut de mai multe ori? De fiecare dată? Ocazional?
- Dacă ai o captură de ecran cu acest bug (ceea ce îți sugerăm), poți folosi Imgur.com pentru încărcarea imaginii și pentru a pune link-ul aici.
